![]() Either BC or F&SCM may be more suitable depending on the situation.Ĭompanies with revenues of $50 – $150M typically decide on Business Central, but also tend to consider the on-premise version as a valid alternative to the SAAS solution, depending on the complexity of their requirements and factors such as the ISV’s they need, the number of modifications required and planned, and transaction volumes.Ĭompanies under $50M generally opt for Business Central SAAS.īudget is often the criteria that drives organizations directly to one or other solution. F&SCM offers features like Month-End Close management, Revenue Recognition Support, Purchase Requisitioning, Budgeting and Forecast Management, Expense Claim Management and Segregation of Duties – all typically required by larger organizations.Ĭlients with revenues of over $150M and growing typically assess both Microsoft solutions before making a decision on where to move to next. Revenue can be a reasonable indicator of the level of complexity around financial management and reporting. It does however indicate how an organization might view the relative affordability of each choice, as Finance & Supply Chain Management typically requires a larger investment than Business Central. ![]() ![]() Revenue is a somewhat arbitrary criteria as it does not consider the complexity of operations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |